Tag Archives: Canon

Camera Repairs Are Expensive

For those who have been fortunate enough not to have needed to have a camera repaired, let me tell you that camera repairs are expensive!

During a shoot earlier this year, I mounted a lens and tele-converter onto my Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, and to my horror, found that the lens would not lock into place.

The small lens locking pin on the lens mount bezel was stuck inside the chamber, meaning that it would not return to its normal position, in which it is protruding from the bezel, thus holding the lens in place.

This is how it looks in its normal, working condition:

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Lens Mount Assembly

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Lens Mount Assembly

I showed it to someone else who was at the shoot — someone who happens to work in the camera business — and he was able to fix it.

I thought nothing more about it until a few weeks ago, when I took the opportunity to photograph some corellas which had visited us.  I mounted a lens and tele-converter onto my camera and began shooting.

After I had finished, I swapped the lens back to the lens that is usually kept mounted on the camera, and again to my horror, I found that the lens locking pin was stuck inside the chamber on the bezel.

I tried using gun oil and a toothpick, but to no avail; the pin was not coming out.  I needed professional help.

I raised a support case with Canon, and received a case number and instructions on shipping the camera to Canon.

The Canon equipment repair process has changed considerably since I lasted needed an item repaired, in that there is no longer a service desk to which equipment can be personally delivered and later collected; instead, it needs to be sent via post or courier.

After a trip to the post office on a Friday, I returned with some packaging material, and an idea about what it would cost to post the camera with insurance.  Given the cost to replace the camera — even though it is over six years old — it would have been foolish to post it without covering most of the cost to replace it, in the event that it was lost or damaged.

On the following Monday, I returned to the post office, after packing the camera well, and off it went.  At this stage, I did not know what the repair cost would be, but from experience, I was not expecting it to be cheap.

Three days later I received a quotation from Canon, at which point matters got really interesting.

The quotation contained the following assessment:

“Upon inspection, found unit has been damaged by some form of external force, as evident by jammed locking pin on the lens mount.”

No, I do not think so.  I am very careful with my gear, and the camera has never been dropped, bumped into anything, or otherwise struck by anything.  It is in very good condition.

Anyway, next came the prices.

The parts needed were as follows:

  1. CB5-3546-000000 (MOUNT, BODYSUS) x 1 @t $32.48 each;
  2. CB3-8363-001000 (SCREW, M2X6.6SUS) x 4 @ $0.16 each;
  3. CB5-1845-000000 (PIN, LENS LOCK(MECH)SUS) x 1 @ $1.76 each; and
  4. CS5-0856-000000 (SPRING, COILS) x 1 @ $0.38 each.

Apparently I needed not only a new pin and the associated spring, but I needed an entirely new bezel and four screws in order to attach it to the camera.

The parts were pretty inexpensive.

However, the real cost came in the form of labour: a whopping $362!

Additionally, there was a $30 fee for return postage.

My estimate is that it would have taken 15 minutes at the most to remove the original parts from the camera and replace them with the new parts.

If Canon can charge $362 for 15 minutes worth of work to replace $35.26 worth of parts, then I am in the wrong business!  I could have done the work myself if I had the parts.

I advised Canon that I wanted to proceed with the repair, and paid the invoice.

Canon repaired my camera and very promptly returned it to me.  It was only away for a little more than a week.  Additionally, Canon returned the original bezel, pin and spring.

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Lens Mount Parts

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Lens Mount Parts

Now I am back in business.

Canon’s total fee was $469.99, so combined with my up-front costs of $10.67 for packing materials and $143.95 for postage with insurance, the total cost of $624.61 made for an expensive proposition to replace $35.26 worth of parts.

The images that I have captured with this camera, on the other hand, are priceless to me.

Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM: Rubber Deterioration

Owners of the Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM may be quite familiar with the rubber coating on the majority of the lens barrel towards the rear.

Over time, and particularly with heat, the rubber deteriorates and becomes unpleasantly sticky, reminiscent of melted electrical tape.

The rubber coating on mine is in a bad state of deterioration.

I raised a support case with Canon Australia, but that approach looks to be time-consuming, inconvenient and expensive, and involves shipping, which I would rather avoid.

The component of the lens containing the rubber coating is actually a relatively inexpensive housing, for which a replacement part exists, and which can easily be replaced by removing six screws.

If your lens is quite old like mine (manufactured in 2007; purchased in 2008), warranty considerations do not apply, so you may like to do it yourself.

In case anyone needs to replace the housing, the part number is CY3-2154-010, and it can be ordered from eBay.

The following video discusses the problem, and shows how the owner dealt with this issue.

The owner in this case decided to remove the rubber coating from his original housing, using an unspecified “little chemical solution”.

This issue is well known on the Internet, but I thought I would post it here in case any 85/1.2L II owners encounter this and do not wish to ship a lens to Canon or pay more than the cost of the housing.

While a replacement lens housing has been ordered, I decided to remove the rubber coating from my lens’s existing housing.

Here is how it looked before (after I had tried to wipe it, which made it worse than it was):

Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM - Rubber Deterioration

Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM – Rubber Deterioration

And here is how it looks now:

Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM - After Removal of Rubber Coating

Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM – After Removal of Rubber Coating

What a huge difference.

To remove the rubber coating, I used a combination of hot water, detergent, hand sanitiser, rectified spirit, white vinegar and methylated spirits, plus a lot of scrubbing.

It was worth the effort.

Kenya Trip 2019 – Gear to Take

Very soon, we are departing for Kenya, for what will be our first visit to Africa since 2015.

Naturally, there is some preparation in terms of photographic equipment.  A photographic safari requires a considerable amount of gear.

Here is a view of the equipment that we would like to take with us:

Kenya Trip 2019 - Gear that We Want to Take

Kenya Trip 2019 – Gear that We Want to Take

And here is a view of what we can actually take with us:

Kenya Trip 2019 - Gear that We Can Actually Take

Kenya Trip 2019 – Gear that We Can Actually Take

In reality, we are taking a decent amount of gear, which will allow us to capture the images that we seek.

My New Canon EF 200mm f/2L IS USM

This is my new Canon EF 200mm f/2L IS USM.

My New Canon EF 200mm f/2L IS USM

My New Canon EF 200mm f/2L IS USM

This is a lens that I first tried in 2008.  It took nine years before I decided to buy one, and it is my third Canon EF super telephoto lens, joining its bigger brothers, the Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM and the Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM.

There is a bit of a story behind this lens.  I was meant to have it much sooner, except the lens which was dispatched from Canon Australia to my supplier disappeared.  Canon had only one more in stock, which was no longer available by the time it was discovered that my lens vanished.

Consequently, a new lens needed to be ordered from Japan, which delayed the acquisition time.  Finally, it arrived, and here it is.

This year has seen some major gear changes in my lineup, with the Canon EF 200mm f/2L IS USM being the latest.  It replaced my long-serving Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM.

In this image, the big 200mm prime is mounted on my new Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, which is also a very recent acquisition.

A 200mm lens like this is not just an ordinary 200mm lens — at f/2, it is the fastest 200mm lens currently available for Canon EOS cameras.  Nikon also has a 200mm f/2 prime in its lineup.

At f/2, the bokeh is incredible, and I bought it to shoot it wide-open; to capture the unique look that this lens produces.

I am looking forward to exploiting its capabilities.

Latest Lovelies

I rarely capture photographs of the gear I use to capture photographs, but this year has seen some changes to my camera and lens rig.

These are two of my latest ‘lovelies’: a Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM, which I purchased on 12/01/2017 to replace my long-serving Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM; and my much newer Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, which I purchased on 23/06/2017.

Latest Lovelies

Latest Lovelies

The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is a substantial upgrade to my Canon EOS 5D Mark II, a 2008-vintage camera which I have been using since 2010.  I will keep my 5D2, but the new 5D4 will be my main camera.

I am looking forward to taking advantage of the increased dynamic range and reduced high-ISO noise of this latest generation of full-frame Canon sensors.

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Coming Soon

After running my Canon EOS 5D Mark II for over seven years, I have finally taken the plunge and ordered a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.

I am looking forward to experiencing the significant feature additions and improvements the latest model offers over the substantially old (2008 model) Canon EOS 5D Mark II.

I am very keen to experiment with more low-light photography and take advantage of the low-light performance that it offers.

While I rarely shoot beyond ISO 400, I have needed to shoot some images at ISO 3,200, and frankly on the Canon EOS 5D Mark II, ISO 3,200 is noisy.  The starfield images I shot in the African wilderness look great at small-to-medium sizes; but at much larger sizes the noise is very evident.  I am interested to see how the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV performs at the same ISO rating.

The in-built GPS receiver is a very appealing feature, as for years I have been recording the GPS coordinates of my shooting locations by using a smartphone app.  Now, the camera will do that automatically and embed the GPS coordinates within the metadata, which makes it fuss-free.

Being able to control the camera via Canon’s app is also very appealing.  I have not yet checked whether my remote release (Canon TC-80N3) is compatible with the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, but either way, I may not need it.

This is a big upgrade for me, as I am generally not inclined to change cameras very often (this will be my fifth EOS camera in 17 years); but it is now time for me to take advantage of the technology available in current-generation cameras.

Whether this new camera will change the way I shoot, or whether it will provide my images with an obvious improvement in image quality is yet to be seen, but bring it on.